MMLONGCITE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Faithfulness of Long-Context Vision-Language Models [NeurIPS 2026]
📢 News
[September, 2026] 🎉 MMLongCite is accepted at NeurIPS 2026.
[May, 2026] Major update to MMLongCite: we extend the benchmark up to 128K tokens and refine the task taxonomy for more comprehensive faithfulness evaluation.
[October, 2025] Code and data of MMLongCite are now publicly available.
MMLongCite is a benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of long-context vision-language models (LCVLMs) through multimodal citation generation.
The benchmark contains 2,280 examples across 8 tasks, covering image-only, image-text interleaved, and video-only contexts. Context lengths span from 8K to 128K tokens.
We also introduce MMLongCite-HR, a high-resolution setting that evaluates fine-grained visual grounding in dense stitched-image inputs. MMLongCite-HR provides two modes: the easy mode stitches 4 images into a single large image with an average resolution of 1K–2K, while the hard mode stitches 16 images into a single large image with an average resolution of 2K–4K.
Figure 1: Task format in MMLongCite.
Figure 2: Statistics of tasks in MMLongCite.
⚙️ Preparation
Environment
Make sure you are in this project folder and then run:
MMLongCite evaluates both citation quality and answer correctness. We use GPT-5.2 as the judge model, and the evaluation scripts support passing in multiple API keys to accelerate evaluation.
Update (October 2026): As GPT-5.2 is no longer available via the API, we now also support Qwen3.6-27B as an open-source judge model. Evaluation results for all models, with Qwen3.6-27B as the judge, are reported in Table 8 of the paper’s appendix.
Among the outputs, citation_result.json and correctness_result.json store per-case metrics for every example, while citation_score.json and correctness_score.json store the overall aggregated metrics for each task. Example evaluation commands are provided in:
bash script/eval.sh
You can run script/eval_with_qwen36.sh to use Qwen3.6-27B as the judge.
📝 Citation
If you find our work helpful, please cite our paper:
@misc{zhou2026mmlongcitebenchmarkevaluatingfaithfulness,
title={MMLongCite: A Benchmark for Evaluating Faithfulness of Long-Context Vision-Language Models},
author={Keyan Zhou and Zecheng Tang and Lingfeng Ming and Qiguang Chen and Wangjie You and Guanghao Zhou and Dan Qiao and Zheming Yang and Libo Qin and Minghui Qiu and Juntao Li and Min Zhang},
year={2026},
eprint={2510.13276},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13276},
}
MMLONGCITE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Faithfulness of Long-Context Vision-Language Models [NeurIPS 2026]
📢 News
[September, 2026] 🎉 MMLongCite is accepted at NeurIPS 2026.
[May, 2026] Major update to MMLongCite: we extend the benchmark up to 128K tokens and refine the task taxonomy for more comprehensive faithfulness evaluation.
[October, 2025] Code and data of MMLongCite are now publicly available.
🚀 Quick Navigation
🔍 Benchmark Overview
MMLongCite is a benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of long-context vision-language models (LCVLMs) through multimodal citation generation. The benchmark contains 2,280 examples across 8 tasks, covering image-only, image-text interleaved, and video-only contexts. Context lengths span from 8K to 128K tokens. We also introduce MMLongCite-HR, a high-resolution setting that evaluates fine-grained visual grounding in dense stitched-image inputs. MMLongCite-HR provides two modes: the easy mode stitches 4 images into a single large image with an average resolution of 1K–2K, while the hard mode stitches 16 images into a single large image with an average resolution of 2K–4K.
Figure 1: Task format in MMLongCite.
Figure 2: Statistics of tasks in MMLongCite.
⚙️ Preparation
Environment
Make sure you are in this project folder and then run:
Data Prepare
You can download MMLongCite data from 🤗 Hugging face. Once downloaded, place the data in the root directory of the repository.
The folder structure is organized as follows:
All data in MMLongCite follows the format below:
id: A unique identifier for the data sample.
context: A list containing all the contextual information (e.g., images, text) needed to answer the question.
question: A list containing the specific question to be answered, which may include text and multiple-choice options.
ground_truth: The correct answer for the question.
meta: A dictionary containing additional information for each case, including:
text_length: The length of text content within the context.
mm_length: The length of multi-modal content within the context.
evidence_ids: A list of position identifiers indicating where the supporting evidence is located within the long context.
Here is an example:
🤖️ Inference & Evaluation
Inference
We provide a vLLM-based inference script in
src/infer_vllm.py. Run inference on the main MMLongCite benchmark:Run inference on MMLongCite-HR:
For models with thinking mode enabled:
Prediction files are saved to:
You can also refer to the example script:
Evaluation
MMLongCite evaluates both citation quality and answer correctness. We use GPT-5.2 as the judge model, and the evaluation scripts support passing in multiple API keys to accelerate evaluation.
Update (October 2026): As GPT-5.2 is no longer available via the API, we now also support Qwen3.6-27B as an open-source judge model. Evaluation results for all models, with Qwen3.6-27B as the judge, are reported in Table 8 of the paper’s appendix.
Citation Evaluation
This produces:
Correctness Evaluation
This produces:
Among the outputs,
citation_result.jsonandcorrectness_result.jsonstore per-case metrics for every example, whilecitation_score.jsonandcorrectness_score.jsonstore the overall aggregated metrics for each task. Example evaluation commands are provided in:You can run
script/eval_with_qwen36.shto use Qwen3.6-27B as the judge.📝 Citation
If you find our work helpful, please cite our paper:
🏷️ License
All code within this repository is under Apache License 2.0.